<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Output Resoultion]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have been testing the results of Dreaming the same image with different starting resolutions.  The first image was at 72 dpi and then I changed it to 266 dpi and Dreamed the same preset.  Not only were the final images very different from each other, but they both had a 72 dpi resolution in CC2015.  As I would like to make large prints of the results, I would prefer a higher resolution even if it takes longer to process. Macbook Pro 13&quot; 1 tb ssd 16 gb ram</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.71squared.com/topic/90/output-resoultion</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:14:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.71squared.com/topic/90.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:07:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Output Resoultion on Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:07:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have been testing the results of Dreaming the same image with different starting resolutions.  The first image was at 72 dpi and then I changed it to 266 dpi and Dreamed the same preset.  Not only were the final images very different from each other, but they both had a 72 dpi resolution in CC2015.  As I would like to make large prints of the results, I would prefer a higher resolution even if it takes longer to process. Macbook Pro 13&quot; 1 tb ssd 16 gb ram</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.71squared.com/post/144</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.71squared.com/post/144</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gersteas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:07:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>