<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Batch process images?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Deep Dreamer plays a chime when it's done processing an image, which is a handy feature for letting you know when it's done, but I was wondering if you can set it to work on a whole folder of images (mostly 640 x 480) so it can process them one at a time, without the user having to initiate the process each time. Processing is fairly slow, especially if the &quot;Trippy&quot; preset is used, so batch processing would be handy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.71squared.com/topic/145/batch-process-images</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 03:55:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.71squared.com/topic/145.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:43:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Batch process images? on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:43:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Deep Dreamer plays a chime when it's done processing an image, which is a handy feature for letting you know when it's done, but I was wondering if you can set it to work on a whole folder of images (mostly 640 x 480) so it can process them one at a time, without the user having to initiate the process each time. Processing is fairly slow, especially if the &quot;Trippy&quot; preset is used, so batch processing would be handy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.71squared.com/post/272</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.71squared.com/post/272</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[timothyarends]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:43:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>